Alrighty so this week was pretty good. normally i get bored with plays but i dont normally read so maybe thats why haha. i have enjoyed the play or whatever you want to call it because it tells a lot of facts that you have to think about.i personally think that the 16 year old boy is guilty because the woman in the window saw him do it and then there are many other facts that support it unlike the juror 8 that knows hes guilty but making up random stuff that is pursuading the other jurors into changing their vote to not guilty. also the other part i like about the book is how some of the jurors have personal issues like juror 3(me) and how they get in fights and get really angry over something that is pretty little and not worth fighting over haha. well thats it for the week i am looking foward to next week.
ok so unfortunately i forgot about the response thing because i normally do it friday night but we had to go drive 2 hours away to pick up my dog. it was worth it and who cares about like 5 points. his name is woody. he was alread named and hes 9 pounds and probably about the size of a cat:). he is realllyyy well behaved and we took him to his first soccer game and yeahh it was cold out but we brought him a blanket and i wraped him up in it and he layed on my lap the entire time. he doesnt bark much and im pretty suprised because he is a morkie which is a yorkie and maltese mix. he loves to play and try to kill a stuffed toy that sqeaks. and then again he also loves to give kisses and lay on your lap like now lol. he never gets shy about anyone or anything its great. well thats it for this week ill be happy to write again next sunday...nott
i really don't think that the boy actually did it though. the woman claims that she saw the boy killing him. but what if the drapes were closed and you could only see the shadow of two people. did you ever thought of that? and the man saw the boy run away. maybe he was running away from the killer or he was in a different appartment altogether. no matter what, I will stick to it that the boy was innocent!
ReplyDeletei agree with mike .
ReplyDelete